Commenting on Bartlett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 2:13-CV-0170 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 8, 2015); In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. C-8 Personal Injury Litigation, No. 2:13-MD-2433 (S.D. Ohio filed Apr. 9, 2013)
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief1 in the Boston Marathon bombing case that t...
For more than two-hundred years, the issue of fair use has been the province of the jury. That recen...
Commenting on Bartlett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 2:13-CV-0170 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 8, 2015);...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently rendered two decisions which represent a compr...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
On July 5, 1984, the Supreme Court in Leon v. United States held that where law enforcement official...
“It is clear that juries will necessarily differ in ‘competence,’ but it is at best incongruous to s...
The rise in the number of patent infringement trials heard by juries has brought criticisms of the j...
This Article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decisions in Daubert and Joiner imply an approach to...
The role of the jury in awarding monetary damages to plaintiffs in a wide range of civil cases has c...
Suits brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 to recover damages for excessive force by the police bear...
This article considers the role of the trial court in responding to the changes wrought by scientifi...
This two-part Article is about certain qualities of fairness –those qualities that although subtle, ...
Over the last four decades, trial consultants have become integral members of the venire process. Be...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief1 in the Boston Marathon bombing case that t...
For more than two-hundred years, the issue of fair use has been the province of the jury. That recen...
Commenting on Bartlett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 2:13-CV-0170 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 8, 2015);...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently rendered two decisions which represent a compr...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
On July 5, 1984, the Supreme Court in Leon v. United States held that where law enforcement official...
“It is clear that juries will necessarily differ in ‘competence,’ but it is at best incongruous to s...
The rise in the number of patent infringement trials heard by juries has brought criticisms of the j...
This Article argues that the Supreme Court\u27s decisions in Daubert and Joiner imply an approach to...
The role of the jury in awarding monetary damages to plaintiffs in a wide range of civil cases has c...
Suits brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 to recover damages for excessive force by the police bear...
This article considers the role of the trial court in responding to the changes wrought by scientifi...
This two-part Article is about certain qualities of fairness –those qualities that although subtle, ...
Over the last four decades, trial consultants have become integral members of the venire process. Be...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief1 in the Boston Marathon bombing case that t...
For more than two-hundred years, the issue of fair use has been the province of the jury. That recen...